<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile Browser Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiltmobility.com/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiltmobility.com/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/</link>
	<description>All about the AT&#38;T Tilt &#38; HTC TyTN II</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 03:33:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ADR</title>
		<link>http://tiltmobility.com/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>ADR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiltmobility.com/2009/01/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>Yes, there are minor changes in the opening screen but not much.

In any case, I personally do not find Skyfire and Opera Mobile 9.5 beta easy to use (as scrolling takes too long).  I love Opera Mini 4.2.  Although it does not support flash and other multimedia, it is extremely fast and very intelligent in displaying pages and zooming for optimal reading.  So far, none of the non-Java browsers comes close to it in performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there are minor changes in the opening screen but not much.</p>
<p>In any case, I personally do not find Skyfire and Opera Mobile 9.5 beta easy to use (as scrolling takes too long).  I love Opera Mini 4.2.  Although it does not support flash and other multimedia, it is extremely fast and very intelligent in displaying pages and zooming for optimal reading.  So far, none of the non-Java browsers comes close to it in performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James aka Crazy Larry</title>
		<link>http://tiltmobility.com/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>James aka Crazy Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiltmobility.com/2009/01/windows-mobile-browser-comparison/#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>Speaking about skyfire; my phone crashed last week. I finally got back around to reinstalling Skyfire 0.8.0.6843 (last update). Once it was up and running I received a message that there was a new update. So I installed that and now have version 0.85.0.8184; I have noticed a difference, except the browser is a little faster.  Anyone else notice any changes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking about skyfire; my phone crashed last week. I finally got back around to reinstalling Skyfire 0.8.0.6843 (last update). Once it was up and running I received a message that there was a new update. So I installed that and now have version 0.85.0.8184; I have noticed a difference, except the browser is a little faster.  Anyone else notice any changes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
